Welcome to the blog of Dr. Lisa Burns' MSS 495: Media Analysis & Criticism Wednesday night class at Quinnipiac University. If you are looking for the latest on media industry trends and insightful media analysis, you've come to the right place.
Wednesday, April 9, 2014
Sunday, April 6, 2014
Marketing and Branding in the NBA
Marketing and Branding in the NBA
David Stern has turned the NBA into a moneymaking machine
since he took it over thirty years ago. In 1983, NBA playoff games were
televised on a tape delay, but now they are broadcast live in 215 countries
worldwide (Badenhausen). The global interest
in basketball has skyrocketed in part to Stern’s new idea of individual player
marketing. The iconic players in the league are what generate cash and a
greater fan base. Players like Kobe Bryant, LeBron James, Kevin Durant, Carmelo
Anthony, and Rajon Rondo are treated like celebrities in the league (
Badenhausen). Star players generate revenue in basketball because there are
only five starting players on the team and a handful of bench players. With
such a smaller team, the impact that one player has on a team is enormous. When
LeBron James played for the Cleveland Cavaliers, he brought the team to new
heights by himself. When he went to Miami, with the help of two other star
players, Dwyane Wade and Chris Bosh, the team is close to impossible to stop.
The point to be made is that a star player in another sport such as football
where you can have up to 22 starting players or baseball with nine men out in
the field, will not make the impact of a star celebrity basketball player. Why
do you think star players in the NBA generate so much interest in the sport
rather than the teams as a whole?
Other factors play into the success that the New York
Knicks and Los Angeles Lakers have seen in the NBA. The New York Knicks have
been the NBA’s most valuable team for the second year in a row and worth over a
billion dollars ($1.4 billion). TV
Ratings and renovations to Madison Square Garden have brought the Knicks to
great revenues, even without the team performing too great on the court. If you
think about a team’s fan base and how many viewers they have for each game, it
is easy to fathom the reasons why Los Angeles and New York do so well in the
sports industry. New York as a city has two football teams (the Giants and the
Jets), two baseball teams (the Yankees and the Mets), and two hockey teams (the
Islanders and the Rangers). When it comes to basketball, however, if you live
in New York, you are most likely a Knicks fan. The population in New York City
is tremendous and with basketball being the only sport where there is only one
New York team, can you picture how many people are interested in the Knicks’
games? With the additions of Carmelo Anthony and Amare Stoudemire, its easy to
see why a team that already generates revenues by itself can boost revenues 27%
with two star players (Badenhausen). Teams like the Los Angeles Lakers and
Boston Celtics have such a profound history of championship titles that they
will always be in the conversation and the playoff picture discussion. Teams
that host playoff games make money. Teams with star players sell jerseys, and
those jerseys generate revenues. Walk down the streets of L.A. and you should
always be able to see a Kobe Bryant “8” on somebody’s back within a hundred
feet.
Another factor to keep in mind when analyzing a sports
franchise’s success is their ownership. In the video from ESPN (http://espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/10632191/coast-coast-future-new-york-knicks-los-angeles-lakers), Israel Gutierrez speaks about the future of four
teams, the Knicks, Lakers, San Antonio Spurs, and Indiana Pacers. The biggest
points Israel made were that with Kobe Bryant leaving the Lakers within three
years and the Spurs losing Tim Duncan and Manu Ginobili within three years,
you’re losing almost half of your offensive production just like that. Israel
Gutierrez pointed out that the Knicks will most likely have a brighter future
than the Lakers because Phil Jackson has a way of turning things around for a
team. He brought the Bulls to success, he brought the Lakers to great heights,
and managing what players you keep as franchise players and when you start
looking for prospects is essential to growing a successful team. How important
do you think ownership is in the NBA, compared to celebrity appeal of
individual athletes?
1. Badenhausen, Kurt. "As Stern Says Goodbye, Knicks, Lakers
Set Records As NBA's Most Valuable Teams." Forbes. Forbes Magazine, 22
Jan. 2014. Web. 06 Apr. 20
2. J.A. Adande and Israel Gutierrez |. "Brighter Future:
Knicks Or Lakers?" ESPN.ESPN Internet Ventures, n.d. Web. 06 Apr. 2014.
3.
"Los Angeles
Lakers." Forbes. Forbes Magazine, n.d. Web. 06 Apr. 2014.
How far do we want athletes to go for our entertainment?
There are points
in some sporting events where the unexpected happens, and no, I am not talking
about a miracle on ice, a diving catch in the back of the end zone or a buzzer
beater to win the game. I am talking
about gruesome injuries that happen during live sporting events. The decision on how to handle horrific injuries in a
broadcast is a tricky matter of negotiating, which tiptoes the line between
being exploitative and being uninformative. Live sporting events are live for a
reason, the viewers thrive the anticipation of what is coming next on. But when
things go wrong, it always seems that the television broadcasts are damned if
they do and damned if they don’t. Viewers either want to see it all or see none
and that’s where it gets tricky for programs.
Right
around this time last year, arguably the most gruesome injury ever shows on
live television was witnessed. On March 31st 2013, Louisville was
playing Duke in the Elite Eight of the Men’s division one basketball tournament
when Louisville guard, Kevin Ware, landed awkwardly after attempting to block a
three-point shot attempt and suffered a compound fracture to his right leg
where the bone was sticking out of the skin. The injury left the crowd, teams
and especially the announcers dumbfounded. Clark Kellogg was quoted by USA
Today’s article, “CBS Handles Kevin Ware Injury With Restraint” saying that
after the injury happened, the game coverage was left “in totally uncharted
territory for everybody in the
building, for players, for us."
On March
22, 1989, another one of the most gruesome looking sports injuries ever to
happen, occurred. In an NHL game between the St. Louis Blues and Buffalo
Sabres, two players collided at the front of the net, and one player's skate
caught Sabres goalie Clint Malarchuk on the neck, slicing open his jugular vein,
which caused blood to start pouring from his neck onto the ice. Amazingly,
Malarchuk left the ice under his own power with the assistance of the team's
trainer. This incident did not only affect Malarchuck, but also affected the
spectators. Seven people in the stands fainted, two had heart attacks, and some
of his own teammates threw up on the ice.
Probably
one of the most knows horrific injuries comes from the 1985 NFL season where
Washington Redskins quarterback, Joe Theisman was hit by New York Giants’
Lawrence Taylor and suffered a compound fracture to the tibia which broke
through his skin. Taylor couldn’t believe his eyes when he saw the damage that
he did. Theisman was rolling around on the ground in horrendous pain while
Taylor is standing next to him jumping up and down, waiving his arms
frantically for the Redskins’ medical crew to come to Theisman’s aid.
These
injuries are terrible and are wished upon no one but this is sports, and these
things unfortunately happen. As a television broadcast, it is very hard to deal
with certain situations. The questions star to arise like, at what point is it
“okay” to show the injuries? Which injuries can be shown and which can’t? Are
you supposed to replay these horrific injuries? Does the audience have the
right to know what is going on? These are all the questions that broadcasts
have to be faced with when something horrific happens during a live event. In
the case of Kevin Ware, at halftime, Greg Gumbel and CBS decided that they
would not show the injury again. CBS Sports head, Sean McManus said, “We did
not try to highlight it. I think we did the right thing.” (Petchesky) He went
on to explain his reasoning by saying, “You have to use great judgment about what your audience can stomach and
what they must see. Actually, maybe more importantly, what they must not see.
We used to run into this in horse racing. Whenever a horse was injured and had
to be euthanized on the track, we tried to show where the injury happened. We
showed that one time and then we'd shoot the scene wide enough so no details
could be seen. I'm sure auto racing has the same protocol if a driver is
injured. It's all part of the production plan and camera meetings: What do and
don't we do if a catastrophic injury takes place.”
This brings me to my final thought.
How far do we want athletes to go for our entertainment? How do you think
television broadcast should handle these certain situations? As a viewer, do
you feel as if you should have the right to know and see everything that is
going on during these games whether it is right or wrong? Like I said earlier,
these situations are tricky but when these horrific injuries happen, there has
to be a point when the viewer deserves the right to know what is happening.
Hiestand, Michael. "CBS Handles Kevin Ware Injury with
Restraint," USA Today 1 April 2013. Web.
Petchesky,
Barry. "Two Replays, No Warning: How Broadcasters Handle Gruesome Injuries."
Deadspin. N.p., 1 Apr. 2013. Web. 06 Apr. 2014.
Raney, Arthur A. “Why We Watch and Enjoy Mediated Sports,” Handbook
of Sports Studies, Jay Coakley and Eric Dunning, eds. Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage, 2008: 313 - 29.
Should college athletes get paid?
There has been more talk about money this past week in college sports rather than who is going to the next big star or winner. A group of Northwestern University athletes have brought to the NCAA’s attention that they strongly feel college athletes should receive pay for their hours put forth and the inherent risks associated involved. In the article “College athletes take labor cause to Capitol Hill,” the Chicago-region director of the National Labor Relations Board ruled last week that Northwestern's football players on scholarships are employees of the university under the National Labor Relations Act and therefore have the right to vote to unionize.(Raum and Hefling) What has college sports come to? Is collegiate level still at the “amateur” status or not? Should student-athletes be paid or otherwise make up beyond scholarships?
All these questions are to be solved but it will take some time. People have just become greedy and feel that they need money for there name and performance rather then sitting back and looking at the big picture of free education and many other great opportunities given to them that other non athlete students do not receive. Mr. Brandt said, "That would be a historic case if some marketing [and] publicity rights are given to players who are amateurs," (Adage)
The Courier Journal states, “The university and the NCAA disagree, arguing that student-athletes are students first and athletes second.” (Jennings) I know being an athlete here at Quinnipiac they really push this as well. My coach always stresses you’re here to get an education first and that you are seen as a “student athlete.” Many players complain that all the hours they put at the field, arena or courts spent on the sports practice for the school it is an outrageous amount of time consuming their everyday life and it’s like a job. It is hard to stay up with academics and still perform how they personally would like to as well as meeting the coaching staff expectations.
Many people support the college athletic programs especially at the larger schools with the football and basketball programs. As the Men’s and Women’s March Madness is currently going on, people believe that this has become a huge business. Forbes' Chris Smith wrote, CBS and Turner Broadcasting make more than $1 billion off the games, "thanks in part to a $700,000 ad rate for a 30-second spot during the Final Four." Athletic conferences receive millions of dollars in payouts from the NCAA when their teams advance deep into the tournament. Ditto for the coaches of the final squads standing. The NCAA, as a whole, makes $6 billion annually. (U.S. news and World Report) The other arguments and lawsuits filed were claiming that none of the players see this money. The players in the past have been in trouble for selling their jerseys or signed for money because of finical problems or just not having the time to work outside of school and sports. Many players feel that the NCAA makes so much money off of them and their level of performance. All the merchandise for example, video games, jersey’s, etc., generates a huge amount of revenue for the NCAA. Kain Colter, starting quarterback at Northwestern: ‘‘we're up here raising awareness.'’(Raum and Hefling)
If we do pay college athletes, how much do we pay them? There needs to be equal salaries for each player and each sport, not just the revenue generating ones. For example, the women’s lacrosse goalie should receive equal pay as the star quarterback on the men’s football team. It is when there is a difference in pay that it violates Title IX and crosses over to professional status. But on the flip side, the argument can be made that the opportunity to both receive an education and get the exposure to win a major professional contract more than compensates NCAA athletes for their efforts. "Rather than push college athletics further and further from academics, we need to bring it closer," says NCAA president Mike Emmert. (U.S.News)
People believe that “There has been a remarkable step made that could revolutionize college sports.”(CBS video) Is it the right steps? Will it take away from the college sports overall? Joe Nocera wrote a New York Times article, "Let's start paying college athletes". In the Collegain University of Richmond’s newspaper, outlined a five-step plan for paying student athletes. This plan included, a free market approach to recruiting, a salary cap for every team as well as a minimum annual salary for every scholarship athlete, a 6 year scholarship so the athletes can finish academically when their eligibility runs out, life time health insurance for each player and creation of a College Players Association. (Barry) Mr. Nocera summarized to say "college sports will become more honest once players are paid.”(NY times)
Overall with the Northwestern University football team unionizing this has brought national attention to the sports media and marketing in collegiate sports. Time will tell….lets level the playing field!
"College Athletes Can Unionize, Federal Agency Says." CBSNews. CBS Interactive, n.d. Web. 06 Apr. 2014.
Nocera, Joe. "Let’s Start Paying College Athletes." The New York Times. The
New York Times, 31 Dec. 2011. Web. 30 Mar. 2014.
"Northwestern Ruling Won't Lead to Mad Dash of College Endorsers."
Advertising Age News RSS. N.p., n.d. Web. 06 Apr. 2014.
"Pay College Athletes, but Keep Union Bosses out of It." Pay College Athletes, but Keep Union Bosses out of It. N.p., n.d. Web. 04 Apr. 2014.
"Should College Athletes Be Paid?"University of Richmond Collegian. N.p., n.d.
Web. 06 Apr. 2014.
"Should NCAA Athletes Be Paid?" US News. U.S.News & World Report, n.d. Web. 04 Apr. 2014.
Raum, Tom and Kimberly Hefling. "College Athletes Take Labor Cause to Capitol Hill," Associated Press 2 April 2014. Web.
Thursday, April 3, 2014
The Certain Future of Fantasy Sports
Fantasy sports is a booming industry
in today’s society, as millions of individuals are playing in games which can
be accessed on all their electronic devices. And the thirst for Fantasy is only
increasing. In his article “Fantasy Big Leagues: How Fantasy Sports are Scoring
with Users”, Nielsen suggests that “Fantasy sports players are also taking
their teams with them on the road, as more than 10 million Americans accessed
fantasy football apps on their smartphones, up 15 percent from a year ago”
(Nielsen). 10 million Americans and counting are downloading apps to access
their fantasy teams across a range of technology platforms, from smartphones to
iPads to laptops. As the popularity of Fantasy sports rises, the demand for
advertising spikes as well, creating a revenue stream where the world of
Fantasy sports is well positioned to remain profitable and popular.
Fantasy games allow a fan to take
control and virtually live out their dream of managing a team of real athletes.
The concept has been around for roughly 30 years, and the rules are simple;
participants draft real life players to create their team and score points
based off how well their athletes perform. They compete with a group of friends
or a group of strangers and try to outscore them in order to win. The hobby has
skyrocketed in popularity with the rise of companies, technology platforms, and
enhanced smartphones contributing to the user experience. “Fantasy sports
participation surged more than 60 percent since 2007, and more than 32 million
people aged 12 and older play in the United States and Canada, research
conducted by Ipsos Public Affairs for the Fantasy Sports Trade Association in
the past year showed” (Clapham).What Fantasy does is it allows fans to feel as
if they are a real General Manager and created a sports team. Participants in
Fantasy sports tend to feel extremely engaged and invested in their teams, the
same way they would in reality.
Some fans take Fantasy sports
incredibly seriously, gambling thousands of dollars on their teams and placing
side bets on their game’s outcomes. One such Fantasy Football League, called
the “Tattoo League”, involves groups of friends who have agreed that whoever
comes in last place during the season has to get a tattoo. Fans are also
spending large amounts of money purchasing trophies for their leagues. “Taylor
Trophies & Sporting Goods in Allen Park typically has a bump in business
just before the regular football draft, and another at the end of December,
when football season winds down, manager Cindy Seamon-Darty said. She sells six
or seven trophies, valued at up to $400 each, every year to fantasy football
leagues. ‘It's very big,’ she said. "These guys will spend $300 or $400 on
a trophy without blinking an eyelid" (Youssef). There is no doubt Fantasy
plays a major role in people’s lives (along with their wallets), and companies
behind the games are seeing revenue soar.
With the rising demand and money in
the Fantasy marketplace, Fantasy sports technology production is increasing to
cater to this large audience. And players themselves have interacted with their
fans about Fantasy sports. Atlanta Falcons wide receiver Roddy White tweeted
out, “If I don’t practice on Friday don’t start me in Fantasy.” The television
show “The League” on FX is a show about a group of friends and their Fantasy
Football league. They get appearances from athletes such as Adrian Peterson,
Chad Johnson, Blair Walsh, Vernon Davis, Greg Jennings and many more. On top of
this, having more ways at your fingertips to access teams through technology
has allowed for more use: some friends of mine join mock drafts (a practice
draft) every time they take a seat in the bathroom. It has also interfered with
people’s jobs, schoolwork, and their social lives, which has led to discussions
on Fantasy Sports Addiction and how it can be best compared to a gambling
addiction.
With all of this said, I wonder what
the world of Fantasy sports will look like in 10 years. As popular as it is
now, I can only imagine what it will become, because instead of turning on NFL
countdown on ESPN on Sunday mornings, fans are tuning into Fantasy Now or
Fantasy Live. These shows have expert analysis on who to start and who to sit.
They also give live injury updates and suggest players to pick up that may be
free agents in your league. The NFL in my opinion is gaining more fantasy fans
than “true” fans. As fans find themselves in situations where they are watching
their favorite team on TV but simultaneously own a fantasy player on the
opposing team (who they want to perform well because money and points are on
the line), it becomes hard to identify where your true fandom lies. But as
Fantasy continues to increase in users and revenue by the millions, it will
continue to fuel sports fulfillment, and unfortunately addiction. The demand
for this popular game is booming, and I believe it will only get more popular
as virtual engagement and technology continues to transform our everyday lives.
Nielsen.
"FANTASY BIG LEAGUES: HOW FANTASY SPORTS ARE SCORING WITH USERS." Nielsen. N.p., 26 Nov. 2013. Web. 3 Apr.
2014.
Youssef,
Jennifer. "Fantasy Sports, Real Profits: Entrepreneurs Cash in on Leagues'
Growing Popularity among Fans." Detroit
News [Detroit] 4 Nov. 2009: B6. Print.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)